≡ Menu

Would Lincoln Text?

TITLE: A photograph of the President and Thoma...
Image via Wikipedia

What is behind Abraham Lincoln’s writing ability?

Abraham Lincoln is known for his powerful writing ability. The Gettysburg Address is held up as an example in school because of its brevity, clarity and emotion. It isn’t easy to write like Lincoln and much as we might like an easy ten-step program to learn his good writing skills, there isn’t one. An article  I was reading recently  described the art of Lincoln’s writing and discussed the techniques that contribute to his skill. The author recalled a letter responding to an article saying that Lincoln’s writing was accomplished by trickery and engineered construction. The letter asserted that engineering is a poor analogy to describe writing skill because it implies mechanical properties while writing is an art.

More than just familiarity with great writing.

While agreeing with the writer’s point, out author points out that there are numerous rhetorical devices in the Gettysburg Address and he describes some of the as they are applied in such masterpieces as the Book of Common Prayer, the King James Bible and the plays of Shakespeare, all of which were read and enjoyed by Lincoln. It is certainly not surprising to find that he would use the same devices in his own writing. But the author continues to say that many people in Lincoln’s time and since have read and enjoyed these works. He asserts that if familiarity and appreciation were all it takes to develop into a graceful and powerful writer, the world would be full of wonderful writers. Certainly the examples of great writing are inspiration and examples to learn from but even so Lincoln’s familiarity with great writing does not fully explain his skill.

Skill developed on the job.

The author suggests that the forces that helped make Lincoln such a effective communicator go far beyond his love of good writing. He believes that the long years of arguing cases in small town courtrooms helped him learn to use powerful and simple words and phrases to communicate with juries of common people. In these courtrooms, there was no place for long-winded phrases and flowery prose. In addition, he suggests that the importance of the telegraph in communicating with his generals during the Civil War helped him develop a skill at condensing his thoughts into strong, effective and brief communications.

What can we learn from Tweets and texting?

As I read this, I began thinking about two of the new communication techniques that have begun to dominate significant segments of our society – Twitter and text messages. Both constrain the length of a communication and force the author to condense and simplify communications. As I struggle to understand and use them effectively, I wonder if they might not have the same ability to teach concise and powerful communication today as the courtrooms and telegraph offices of Lincoln’s day. Certainly with the numbers of people embracing these new communication tools, everybody is challenged to condense and simplify their writing. Is it possible that new generations of writers will learn powerful new writing skills because of their experience with Twitter and text messages? I don’t know. Will there be a President, facile with these new forms of communication that will be remembered in the future for his writing just like Lincoln?

Time will tell.

This post has been reworked from  the original.  My intent was to improve the keywords but I did tweak the writing as well.  I will appreciate anyone willing to compare this to the original and comment.

{ 8 comments… add one }
  • Ryan Hanzel March 15, 2010, 10:46 am

    Great post Ralph! I regretfully have not followed as much as I should have during the civil war period in history class. Great informative post!
    .-= Ryan Hanzel´s last blog ..Don’t get worked up =-.

  • Ralph March 15, 2010, 11:25 am

    Lincoln was an amazing man. Things would have been different if he had not been assasinated.

  • Eleanor Edwards March 16, 2010, 1:54 am

    Hi Ralph,
    I read the post, got to the end and wanted to add that for everyday folks, the constraints of 140 characters is great. It’s helped me improve my titles for blog posts no end 😉

    But that’s not what you really want to hear. You want thoughts on the two versions don’t you? Well maybe it’s because I read and enjoyed it first, but I felt the updated post was much more interesting and drew me in quicker. You took your subject (AL) and introduced him from the very beginning. This engaged me right away.

    Can’t comment on your use of keywords as this is all Greek to me 😉

    Great thought provoking post.
    .-= Eleanor Edwards´s last blog ..Virgin to the rescue? It’s possible but we’ll need your help =-.

  • Ralph March 16, 2010, 7:37 am

    Eleanor,
    Thanks. You responded to the meat of the post and commented on the difference between the two. I couldn’t ask for more. I have the same feeling about the constraints on test messages and tweets forcing better and more effective communications. Happy that you agree. When I looked at the old post I felt that it could be made better. Don’t know if it is fair to credit the experience writing over time with the improvement but I will claim it anyway,

  • Paul March 16, 2010, 11:23 am

    Ralph,

    A great post and very interesting; living in the UK any studies about Lincoln were limited to our own choices; so my knowledge is somewhat limited.

    From my limited studies of Lincoln, I believe he had mediumistic tendencies and was supposed to have predicted his own death. If this is true, perhaps he had the gift of many other genius’ and was led from the spirit realm.

    Regards

    Paul
    .-= Paul´s last blog ..Performance Related . . . =-.

    • Ralph March 16, 2010, 12:14 pm

      Paul, I don’t know about his foresight although now that you mention it I do recall something about not expecting to live after the war. He was clearly a remarkable man who was completely self-educated.

  • Julius Kuhn-Regnier March 18, 2010, 12:28 am

    Great thought here Ralph. I liked the idea of Twitter making you a better writer. It might make you one indeed. I just think you have to distinguish between people who use Twitter to talk to other people and people who solely promote their content.
    I think it’s only the former group that might become a better writer through Twitter.
    .-= Julius Kuhn-Regnier´s last blog ..The 3 Unwritten Rules of Blogging =-.

  • Ralph March 18, 2010, 9:30 am

    Julius,
    That is probably a good distinction. You have to be trying to communicate something rather than just relaying someone else’s thought. Since Twitter is still an enigma to me, this is all speculation on my part. The word limitation is so similar to telegrams.

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge